Copyright & Trademark Matters Insights and Developments in Copyright and Trademark Law

Tag Archives: Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

“REDSKINS” US Trademark Registrations are Canceled for Disparaging Native Americans

Posted in Disparaging Marks, Section 2(a), Trademark, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Written By: Susan Neuberger Weller A three-judge panel of the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), for the second time and in a 2-1 decision, has held that the REDSKINS trademark used in connection with professional football and related services by the Washington Redskins National Football League team was disparaging to a substantial composite… Continue Reading

How Much “Intent” is Enough to Support an “Intent to Use” Trademark Application?

Posted in 15 U.S.C. 1051(b), Intent-To-Use Applications, Trademark Prosecution, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Written by: Susan Neuberger Weller For many years now, the US Trademark Office has accepted trademark applications based upon a “bona fide intent to use” the applied-for mark on all the goods and/or to provide all of the services listed in the application at the time of filing.  Unlike in many other countries, a US… Continue Reading

TTAB Refuses to Register “The Slants,” Finding it to be “Disparaging”

Posted in Section 2(a), Trademark, Trademark Prosecution, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Written by: Susan Neuberger Weller Racial and ethnic disparagement is a hot topic at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board these days. While a decision is still pending in the latest cancellation action involving the long disputed WASHINGTON REDSKINS professional football team marks, the Board in In re Simon Shiao Tam, recently affirmed a federal… Continue Reading

Oops! Assignment of Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications: Easy But Not Simple

Posted in 15 U.S.C. 1051(b), Assignment, Intent-To-Use Applications, Trademark, Trademark Prosecution, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Written by: Susan Neuberger Weller  The language in the Trademark Act is very clear on the issue of assignment of intent-to-use applications.  In a recently issued precedential opinion, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has held, once again, that Section 10(a)(1) of the Act really means what it simply states, namely, that prior to filing… Continue Reading

Why Can’t I Use My Own Name? : Trademarks and Surnames

Posted in Section 2 (e) – Surnames, Surnames, Trademark

Written by: Susan Neuberger Weller  There are many “myths” that float about in the general public about what can and cannot function as a trademark. For example, people often tell me that they “know” that “common words” can never be protected as trademarks. That, of course, is totally false. Common words can absolutely function as… Continue Reading

Are Dr. Dre’s Claims of Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution Enough to “Beat” His Opponents?

Posted in Dilution, Section 2(d), Trademark, Trademark Infringement

Written by Susan Neuberger Weller Rapper Dr. Dre and the company he co-founded, Beats Electronics, LLC, are on the offensive at the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board challenging a multitude of third-party applications for marks which consist of or contain the word “Beat”. The company owns a number of trademark registrations for use of… Continue Reading

Hershey Thinks Outside the Box (or the Candy Wrapper) in Seeking Trademark Protection for a Product Shape

Posted in Product Configuration, Trademark, Trademark Prosecution, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Written by Susan Neuberger Weller On July 2, 2012, the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB” or “Board”) granted Hershey’s request to register the design and shape of a chocolate bar as a trademark on the Principal Register. The design was described as “a configuration of a candy bar… Continue Reading